Capability Gap

Working research record · 15 markets · 22 companies · Updated 29 August 2026

The buyers have money
They do not have people

Fifteen markets where someone stands in the middle, assembles a supply nobody else can reach, and keeps the difference. This is the market-by-market working record: what the mechanism is, who is already there, how the money splits, and — kept deliberately visible — what we have not been able to establish.

01

Six questions decide everything

Every vertical page answers the same six questions in the same order, so the answers sit side by side. Four of them do most of the work.

01 · BUD

Budget depth

How much money sits behind the buying decision, and how urgently it must be spent.

02 · SUP

Supply difficulty

How hard the seller side is to assemble. Hard is good: it is the only thing a competitor cannot copy in a weekend.

03 · SPR

Spread

What fraction of the money passing through you, you actually keep.

04 · HLD

Holdability

Whether buyer and seller can cut you out once they have met, and whether one buyer can end you.

05 · AI

AI direction

Whether capable models grow this budget or delete it.

06 · SPD

Speed to first dollar

How long from a standing start to a real invoice.

The rubric, and the argument for why these six and not others, is in the framework. The name for the mechanism — and why it is not a marketplace, a staffing firm or an agency, though it is sold as all three — is in what the model is.

02

Where the spread actually survives

Ranked by the six scores. The sum is a blunt instrument and the ranking is a judgement, not a measurement — but the order is where the argument starts.

01
Adversarial evals and red-team crowds
A brand-new budget line with no salary to be benchmarked against, supply that cannot be recruited by job ad, and a middleman that monetises the crowd's output as software rather than reselling its hours.
26/30
build
02
Forward-deployed engineering
Deployment is the acknowledged bottleneck and the budget is real; the open question is whether any of these companies converts field work into a renewing licence before the 58x mark has to be justified.
22/30
watch
03
Robotics teleoperation and physical-world data
The only human-data vertical where physical capital blocks the laptop-marketplace playbook — which is why quality teleop still holds a 40–65% margin while egocentric video went to free in eighteen months.
21/30
build
04
Expert data for frontier labs
The budget is real, urgent and growing. The margin is a staffing margin, the buyers are two companies wearing five names, and every seat at the top table is taken.
20/30
crowded
05
Expert networks
A 70–80% take that survived forty years, three compliance scandals and every disintermediation attempt — because the product was never the expert, it was recruitment speed plus indemnity. Whether the incumbents sell to AI labs is the single most valuable unanswered question in this atlas.
20/30
open
06
Data-centre labour and site brokerage
The only capacity vertical where the unit is not fungible and not indexed, so a real spread can still live there — but the incumbents are ordinary staffing firms at 30–40% markups and nobody has built the AI-native version.
20/30
watch
07
Contingency recruiting marketplaces
The supply-side wedge is real and the AI tailwind is real; the TAM is a tenth of what the pitch says and there is no independent evidence any of it works.
18/30
watch
08
Outbound and GTM-as-a-service
The spread is genuine at 55–75% and the sale closes in weeks, but every retainer is priced against a salary the buyer can look up, and the supply scarcity that made Clay agencies expensive in 2024 was gone by 2026.
18/30
crowded

All 15 verticals · the full scoring table

03

The arguments that cut across every vertical

14 topic pages on the mechanism itself: what a rake can be, why gross revenue is not revenue, what actually stops a buyer and a seller cutting you out, and what the law does to a crowd in December.

04

What this is, and what it is not

63 pages, roughly 97,000 words, built in one pass and meant to be added to.

It is

A working record with its seams showing

Every page carries a confidence mark and every number that comes from a leak, a press claim or a company's own blog is marked as such. The open questions page lists what we could not establish, and it is long on purpose.

It is not

Diligence, and not advice

Almost every company here is private and discloses nothing it is not forced to. Take rates are inferred, revenue figures conflict between reputable outlets by factors of two, and the single most important number in the sector — what a frontier lab actually pays for human data — has never been disclosed by anyone.

How this was built and where it is weak · the evidence register